Welcome to General Chat - GAW Community Area
This General Chat area started off as a place for people to talk about things that are off topic, however it has quickly evolved into a community and has become an integral part of the GAW experience for many of us.
Based on its evolving needs and plenty of user feedback, we are trying to bring some order and institute some rules. Please make sure you read these rules and participate in the spirit of this community.
Rules for General Chat
-
Be respectful to each other. This is of utmost importance, and comments may be removed if deemed not respectful.
-
Avoid long drawn out arguments. This should be a place to relax, not to waste your time needlessly.
-
Personal anecdotes, puzzles, cute pics/clips - everything welcome
-
Please do not spam at the top level. If you have a lot to post each day, try and post them all together in one top level comment
-
Try keep things light. If you are bringing in deep stuff, try not to go overboard.
-
Things that are clearly on-topic for this board should be posted as a separate post and not here (except if you are new and still getting the feel of this place)
-
If you find people violating these rules, deport them rather than start a argument here.
-
Feel free to give feedback as these rules are expected to keep evolving
In short, imagine this thread to be a local community hall where we all gather and chat daily. Please be respectful to others in the same way
Rules For the rest of the Site also accessible on the sidebar.
--
Honestly, this one is almost unbelievable.
The Empire State is rapidly becoming a scene out of “The Handmaid’s Tale” — not because of conservatives, but because of Democrats in Albany.
The state Legislature has now passed Senate Bill 9316, and if Hochul signs it, New York law will replace the terms “mother” and “father” with so-called gender-neutral alternatives.
Under the bill, mothers become “gestating parents.”
Fathers become “non-gestating parents.”
In the name of inclusion, New York lawmakers have managed to do something remarkably regressive: stripping women of perhaps the most meaningful identity they can ever hold.
What do we call Mother’s Day?
Just a few weeks ago, Americans celebrated Mother’s Day.
Politicians flooded social media with tributes praising mothers for their sacrifices, their love and their irreplaceable role in the lives of their children.
Schools sent home handmade cards; restaurants filled with families honoring the women who brought them into the world and raised them.
Now many of those same political leaders are supporting legislation that effectively tells women that “mother” is no longer an appropriate word.
The issue isn’t merely semantic: The bill has real-world implications in family court and legal settings, where mothers and fathers have historically been recognized as serving distinct roles in the lives of children.
By reducing motherhood to a gender-neutral biological function, lawmakers are not simply changing terminology; they are redefining one of the most fundamental human relationships in existence.
What makes this especially offensive is how profoundly dehumanizing the new language is.
Progressives are quick to deploy passionate rhetoric about empowering women, especially in their reproductive rights, but now they themselves have created the term “gestating parent,” reducing a woman to her reproductive organs.
Doing so strips away the humanity, history, affection, sacrifice and meaning associated with motherhood and replaces it with the kind of sterile language one might expect to find in a medical textbook or livestock inventory.
As a mother of six, I find that reduction both insulting and bizarre.
Motherhood is not a biological event that concludes in a delivery room.
When my children wake up from a nightmare, they don’t call for their gestating parent.
When they scribble notes on construction paper or write cards for birthdays and holidays, they don’t write, “To my favorite gestating parent.”
They write “Mom.”
Motherhood is not a medical condition.
For decades, feminists argued — correctly — that women should never be reduced to their reproductive capacity.
Yet somehow we’ve arrived at a moment where progressive lawmakers have taken the most meaningful female experience many women will ever have and reduced it to a bodily process.
It’s difficult to imagine a more dehumanizing way to describe a woman.
(more)
